Search Results for "Encroachments Removal"

296 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 296 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Eviction Notice Under Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction Act, 2007 — Show Cause Notice Not Justiciable. Court Directs Authorities to Conclude Enforcement Action Within Twelve Weeks for Removal of Encroachments in Water Bodies.

The petitioner, Mugebur Rahman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a Form I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Orders in Mundkarial Dispute. Key Issue Whether Mamlatdar Had Jurisdiction to Determine Mundkarial Rights When Reference Was Made Under Section 32 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975.

The litigation originated from two civil suits filed in 1992 by M/s. Suvarn Rajaram Bandekar Discretionary Trust against one Armando Cardozo for remov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Demolition of Illegal Constructions on Water Bodies in Tamil Nadu. Court Directs Removal of Encroachments and Restoration of Water Bodies to Protect Environment and Public Interest Under Public Trust Doctrine and Article 21.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by various individuals and associations challenging the demolition of constructions on water bodies and river b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.

The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Compensation Award Not Challenged on Merits. Petitioners' Challenge to Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Fails as They Did Not Seek Reference for Higher Compensation and Acquiesced to Proceedings.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original owner Anwar Hajee Alimohammed Hajee Cassum Agboatwala and other co-owners, filed a writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...