Search Results for "Delay Condone"

1009 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1009 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Deliberates on Applicability of Limitation Act to Appeals Before Collector Under Section 137 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Issue Centered on Whether Collector is a 'Court' for the Purpose of Section 29(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.

The writ petition arose from a demand notice dated 23 June 2003 issued to the petitioner, proprietress of Vishal Liquors, an ex-CLII licensee, for an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses FCI's Appeal in Customs Duty Refund Case — Limitation for Appeal Under Section 128 Cannot Be Condoned. Import of Section 129A to condone delay in first appeal under Section 128 is impermissible as Customs Act is a complete code.

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 104 of CPC, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitral Tribunal Mandate for Unreasonable Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Condonation of delay set aside as claimant failed to show sufficient cause for 7-month delay.

The petitioner, Wanbury Ltd., filed a petition under sections 14(1)(a), 14(2), and 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case -- Delay in Filing Complaint Condoned as Bonafide -- Cognizance Taken Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Upheld Despite Procedural Irregularity

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by S. Nagesh against the Karnataka High Court order that rejected his petition to quash a complaint under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Civil Suit — Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory. Petitioner/Defendant Granted Relief as No Dilatory Tactics Were Adopted and Sufficient Cause Was Shown for Delay.

The petitioner/defendant challenged the judgment and order dated 30th June 2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Margao, which decl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit. Appellant Failed to Prove Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The appeal arose from an order of the City Civil Court dismissing the appellant's Notice of Motion to set aside an ex-parte decree in a partition suit...