Search Results for "Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"

429 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 429 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Civil Revision Petition Against Trial Court's Failure to Consider Interim Injunction in SARFAESI Act Matter — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioners, Dr. Jaishith Jebakumar Manuel and Pon Manju Usha, filed a suit (O.S.No.118 of 2025) before the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Limitation Case, Holds Section 7 Application Time-Barred Under Article 137 of Limitation Act. The Court ruled that Article 62 of Limitation Act applies only to suits, not to applications under Section 7 of IBC, and time-barred debts cannot be revived under the Code.

The case involves an appeal against the judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which had dismissed the appellant's appeal and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Order in Bank Guarantee Dispute. The court held that the Debt Recovery Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain claims for recovery of amounts due under bank guarantees, and the petitioner's challenge was without merit.

The petitioner, Gammon India Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 28th September 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Cancellation of Preliminary Order Under Section 145(1) CrPC — Magistrate's Satisfaction of Apprehended Breach of Peace Must Be Based on Material on Record

The applicant, Grasim Industries Limited, filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Proced...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession. The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience was in his favor, restraining the bank from evicting him pending suit.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondent No.1 (original plaintiff) against the appellant (original defendant No.1) and respondent Nos.2 a...