Search Results for "Customs tariff"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Customs tariff"

312 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Speaking Order. Settlement Commission's order set aside for failing to consider submissions and provide reasons, remanded for fresh consideration.

9 Jun 2022

The petitioners, M/s Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. and its employees, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Settlement Commission, Cu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Dispute Over Related Person Status. The court held that sales between subsidiaries of a common holding company do not constitute transactions with a 'related person' under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as there was no mutual interest in each other's business, applying the arm's length principle.

22 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning the valuation of excisable goods under th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Leasing of Wagons to Railways. Leasing of Wagons to Railways Constitutes 'Supply of Tangible Goods Services' Under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Finance Act, 1994.

18 Apr 2019

The Commissioner of CGST, ST & Central Excise filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order dated 05/04/201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

10 Jul 2015

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tax Classification Appeal -- 'Appellants Product' Held as Fruit Drink Under UPVAT Act -- Appellants Succeeds Against Commercial Tax Commissioner

25 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed appeals filed by Appellants challenging the classification of their product under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Modvat/CENVAT Credit Case — Assessee Entitled to Credit on Moulds Supplied by OEM Without Ownership or Lease. The court held that after the 1994 amendment, Rules 57Q and 57R of Central Excise Rules, 1944 do not require ownership or lease of capital goods for availing credit; use in manufacture is sufficient.

16 Feb 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

24 Aug 2023

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Modvat Credit Case — Upholds CESTAT's Order Setting Aside Demand and Penalty for Violation of Natural Justice. The demand under repealed Rule 57-I was invalid after substitution by CENVAT Rules 2002 and the assessee was denied effective opportunity of hearing.

1 Apr 2019

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 27 May 2005 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Notification 14/2010-ST is Clarificatory for Service Tax on Drilling Rigs in Continental Shelf. Appeal Admitted on Questions of Territorial Applicability of Service Tax to Offshore Drilling Services Under Finance Act, 1994.

28 Apr 2015

The appellant, M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd., entered into contracts with ONGC in February and May 2009 to provide offshore drilling services using hire...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Rigid Frame Columns Are Steel Structurals Classifiable Under Section 14(iv)(v) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule Entry C-55(v) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court examines the classification of pre-fabricated building components and the interpretation of 'steel structurals' in commercial parlance.

23 Dec 2016

...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)