Search Results for "CPC applicability"

747 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 747 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Land Owners’ Appeal, Remands Land Acquisition Reference for Fresh Consideration. Settlement Validity Must Be Examined Under KUDA Act and CPC, Prior Government Approval Necessary for Consent Award.

The appellants were owners of lands bearing Survey Nos.304/2A and 304/2B, measuring 11 acres 24 guntas, situated at Mahalbagayat, Vijayapura. The land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Absence of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent factual findings by lower courts upheld as appellants failed to establish any legal error in dismissal of suit for injunction and adverse possession claim under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The dispute originated from a Regular Civil Suit filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction against the State of Gujarat and its officers to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Plaint in Money Recovery Suit - Applicant Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Succeeds -Plaintiff' Suit Barred by Maharashtra Money Lending Act Due to Unlicensed Lending

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an interim application filed by the defendant under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Injunction Simpliciter Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession Over Disputed Strip of Land.

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for permanent injunction simpliciter against the respondents (original defendants) claiming that the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.

The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Appeal for Lack of Evidence of Joint Family Property. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove that suit properties were ancestral joint family properties, and the suit was barred by limitation and res judicata.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 30.01.2018 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Kolar, in O.S. No. 42/2012, dismissing the suit for pa...