Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"

456 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Joint Consumer Complaint by Flat Buyers Under Section 12(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Common Grievance Sufficient Despite Different Dates, Costs, and Sizes. NCDRC's Dismissal Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Consideration.

24 Aug 2020

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 19 February 2016, which dismissed a consumer compl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.

14 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Execution Second Appeal as Not Maintainable Against Order Under Order 21 Rule 11 CPC. Order Allowing Execution Petition Under Order 21 Rule 11 CPC Does Not Amount to a Decree and Hence No Second Appeal Lies.

6 Apr 2015

The case pertains to an Execution Second Appeal filed by B. Kashinath Choudhary against an order dated 11.03.2013 passed by the Principal Civil Judge ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Service Matter — Appellant Institution Succeeds in Proving Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. The respondent failed to establish his employment with the appellant, leading to dismissal of the suit for declaration and injunction.

1 Mar 2013

The appellant, The Chairman The State Government Employees Shikshana Sangha, Laxmi Complex, Neeligin Road, Hubli, represented by its Principal, filed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Adverse Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant failed to prove adverse possession for over 12 years as required under Section 65 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.

10 Jun 2016

The appellant, Virupakshappa, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Answers Referred Questions on Adequacy of Protection Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act and Grant of Interim Injunctions. The Court Examined Whether Section 52 TP Act Provides Sufficient Safeguard to Deny Injunction Pendente Lite and the Role of Notice Registration Under Section 18 of the Indian Registration Act.

4 Oct 2016

The appeal arose from an order of the Trial Court rejecting the appellant's application for temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Lotteries Regulation Act Provisions as Unconstitutional. Court upholds Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 of Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 and Rule 5 of Lotteries (Regulation) Rules, 2010 as valid and within legislative competence.

11 May 2023

The State of Meghalaya filed Original Suit No. 1 of 2021 in the Supreme Court of India under Article 131 of the Constitution, challenging the constitu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree in Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Property Dispute Among Multiple Parties Pertaining to Immovable Property Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

1 Oct 2024

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Share Dispute Due to Limitation and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiff's claim for declaration of share ownership and rectification of register barred by limitation under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 as cause of action arose in 1998 but suit filed in 2008.

16 Mar 2017

The plaintiff, Messer Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in British Virgin Islands, filed a suit in 2008 seeking a declaration that it is the ow...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 41 of Punjab Courts Act, 1918 by Reversing Concurrent Findings of Fact on Readiness and Willingness. The court restored the decree for specific performance holding that readiness and willingness is a finding of fact and that a subsequent power of attorney can ratify prior acts.

24 Jul 2019

The appellant, Randhir Kaur, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated November 5, 2004, for land measuring 193 kanals 18 ma...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)