Search Results for "Bombay Stamp Act 1958"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Bombay Stamp Act 1958"

319 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Period of Bona Fide Prosecution of Earlier Proceedings Excluded for Limitation Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court permitted the plaintiff to amend the plaint to seek exclusion of time spent in prosecuting a suit and appeal in the Small Causes Court, holding that such amendment is necessary for determining the real controversy and does not change the nature of the suit.

10 May 2013

The plaintiff, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), filed a suit for specific performance against the defendants in the Bombay High Court. The su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Interim Applications in Property Suits Regarding Appointment of Court Receiver. The Heirs of Sole Proprietor Seek Relief Against Multiple Defendants Including Developers and Property Owners.

3 Nov 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

28 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals from Order in Agricultural Land and Property Dispute — Appeals Filed by Legal Heirs of Narayanrao Nanasaheb Mane-Deshmukh Against Multiple Respondents. The appeals arise from orders of the trial court, the nature of which is not specified in the available text.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession or ouster, and the suit for partition was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

8 Jun 2026

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant no. 2 (since deceased, represented by his legal heirs) against the judgment and decr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Recovery of Business Premises — Conducting Agreement Not Proved as License; Relationship of Licensor-Licensee Not Established. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove the conducting agreement and the defendant's possession was adverse, barring the suit by limitation.

19 May 2020

The appellants (original defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 20th March 2007 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court, which decreed the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharvan Developers Private Limited and others, and by Jayesh Mehta and others, challenging a demolition ...

High Court

SECOND APPEAL NO. 708 OF 2008

21 Mar 2017

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Contract Recovery Suit Against Government — Notice Under Section 80 CPC Not Required for Executive Engineer as Public Officer When Suit is Against Government. Limitation Period for Suit Against Government is Three Years Under Article 112 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not One Year Under Article 1.

17 Sep 2010

The appellants, M/s Disha Constructions and its partners, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 9,15,550/- with interest against the State of Goa and the E...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)