WRIT PETITION NO.8952 OF 2009
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"
6411 result(s) found
Found 6411 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Fair Price Shop Authorization Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Minister's suo motu revision set aside as it was passed without notice to the petitioner and exceeded statutory powers under the Maharashtra Essential Commodities (Public Distribution System) Order, 2005.
5 Mar 2013The petitioner, Sudam Kesu Pawar, was a card holder of a fair price shop run by respondent No.4, Dharma Lalu Rathod, in Yawal Pimpri, Tq. Ghansawangi,...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Investigation Order in Courier Theft Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence Against Company Employees. The court held that where a parcel is delivered intact and no open delivery is taken, no prima facie case of theft is made out against the courier company or its employee under Sections 378, 379 IPC.
7 Mar 2011The applicants, Blue Dart Express Ltd. (a courier company) and its territorial service representative, filed a criminal application under Section 482 ...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project — Petitioners Fail to Show Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights. The court held that the acquisition under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 was valid and the challenge was barred by delay and laches.
13 Apr 2023The petitioners, who are agriculturists from various villages in Gangapur taluka, Aurangabad district, filed two writ petitions challenging the acquis...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Notification Extending Administrator's Term for Municipal Council — Election Must Be Held Within Three Months. Failure to Conduct Elections Within Stipulated Period Violates Section 47 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.
31 Aug 2015The petitioners, residents of Satara Deolai Municipal Council area, challenged a notification dated 30th June 2015 issued by the State Government exte...
- 183
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
1 Jul 2010The appellant, Damodhar Rambhau Inchal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 102 of 2008 for offences under...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Caveat in Execution Proceedings — Caveat Under Section 148A CPC Not Maintainable After Execution Application Is Filed. Court Holds That Assignee Decree-Holder Can Execute Decree Without Notice to Judgment-Debtor Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC.
2 Dec 2021The petitioners, who are judgment-debtors in a pending execution application, filed a caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Industrial Court Stay on Promotion/Transfer Order in Newspaper Company Dispute — Transfer as Condition of Service Upheld in Absence of Malafides. Court holds that Industrial Court cannot interfere with transfer order issued in exigencies of service when transfer is an express condition of employment and no prima facie case of malafide is made out.
2 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court dealt with a petition challenging an interim order of the Industrial Court, Thane, which temporarily restrained the petitioners ...
- 317
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Writ Petitions Challenging Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Awards. Court holds that the Insurance Company cannot challenge the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal without depositing the entire awarded amount under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
26 Feb 2022The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed three writ petitions (WP No. 12529/2021, 12530/2021, and 12532/2021) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Be...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.
23 Dec 2015The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...
- 119
