Search Results for "1984 Amendment"

1486 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1486 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Airport Land Acquisition in Marol Village — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 90 per sq. m. for 1981 and 1982 Notifications. Court Relies on Expert Valuer's Report and Rejects SLAO's Low Valuation Based on Inadequate Comparable Sales.

The judgment pertains to two Land Acquisition References (LAR No.18 of 1988 and LAR No.19 of 1988) filed by A.H. Wadia Charity Trust (the Claimant) se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Repurchase Not Enforceable. Receipt for Reconveyance Does Not Constitute a Valid Contract for Sale Under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Suit Barred by Limitation.

The dispute pertains to a suit for specific performance of an alleged agreement to repurchase suit land. The plaintiff, Dattu Kadu Aher, originally mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal: Stranger to Compromise Decree Can Challenge It by Separate Suit — Order 23 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Bar Such Suit

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the appellant, Triloki Nath Singh, seeking a declaration that a compromise decree dated 15 September 1994 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition Challenging Land Transfer Without Previous Sanction Under Section 43 of Bombay Tenancy Act. Post-transfer sanction cannot regularize invalid transfer; MRT order set aside.

The petitioner, Smt. Saraswati Shamrao Dhere, was a tenant of half portion of agricultural land in Shiroli, Kolhapur. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were ten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...