Search Results for "declaration void"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "declaration void"

2782 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2782 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging ULC Act Proceedings — Proceedings Deemed Abated Under Repeal Act Due to Non-Completion of Vesting. Landowners' Successors Entitled to Benefit of Section 3 of ULC Repeal Act, 1999 as Physical Possession Not Taken.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioners, Zainulabedin Abdul Razzak Kokni and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging proceedings under the Urba...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Plaintiff's Claim of Bonafide Purchase Fails as Prior Decree in O.S.No.34 of 1984 Was Binding and Sale Deeds Were Executed During Pendency of Litigation.

17 Mar 2026

The appellant, H.Prema Devakumari, was the unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for declaration and injunction. She claimed to have purchased plot No.9 fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company Application as Not Maintainable for Lack of Leave Under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956. Applicants Sought Declaration Against Depositors Management Committee Without Prior Approval of Company Court.

22 Mar 2017

The judgment pertains to Company Application No.85 of 2014 filed by six applicants (Shri Kashinath R. Jhunjhunwala and others) against M/s Laxmichand ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Purchaser in Pending Eviction Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Impleadment Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Purchaser of suit property during pendency of litigation is entitled to be impleaded to protect her interest, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 only binds the purchaser by the decree, not prohibits impleadment.

19 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Minalini Lalit Modi, purchased the suit flat from the tenant (respondent no.2) during the pendency of an eviction suit filed by the la...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the offence under Section 138 NI Act is committed at the place of dishonour and service of notice, which was Delhi, not Bangalore.

9 Nov 2015

The petitioners, Sri Devidas Garg, Smt. Amita Garg, and Sri Santhosh Kumar Garg, filed two criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit properties, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

29 Apr 2014

The appellant, Basavaraj Basavanneppa Pattan, filed six second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property. The Court Held That Mere Membership in a Sangha Does Not Confer Ownership Rights Over the Sangha's Property and That the Plaintiffs' Claim Was Barred by Limitation.

7 Aug 2013

The appellants, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, filed Regular First Appeal No. 343 of 2010 before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore aga...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Holding Claim Under Section 24(2) of the New Act Not Established. The Court Found That Possession Taken and Compensation Deposited in 1998, Twin Conditions of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Not Met.

5 Mar 2025

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State for constructing government offices. Notification under Section 4(1) of the...

High Court

Madras High Court Disposes of Nidhi Company's Challenge to Rejection of NDH-4 Application and Constitutional Validity of Companies Act Amendments; Directs Fresh Consideration of Application on Merits While Leaving Legal Issues Open. Rejection of Form NDH-4 beyond the 45-day time limit without considering the petitioner's reply was found to be procedurally irregular, warranting fresh decision.

20 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a Nidhi company, filed an application in Form NDH-4 on 15.04.2020 seeking declaration as a Nidhi under the Companies Act, 2013. The se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Land Owners' Appeals and Quashes Land Acquisition Notification Due to Non-Implementation of Scheme Over 32 Years. Non-utilization of 88% of Acquired Land and 23-Year Delay in Compensation Deposit Render Acquisition Proceedings Void Under BDA Act.

28 Oct 2015

The land owners owned property in Sy.No.4 of Boopasandra Village, Bangalore North Taluk. The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) issued a preliminar...

186 187 188 189 190

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)