Search Results for "witness summoning"

359 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 359 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Secret information not reduced to writing and sent to superior officer, and accused not informed of right to be searched before Magistrate or Gazetted Officer, leading to acquittal.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three appellants convicted under Sections 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal from Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused for Murder and Destruction of Evidence After Establishing Deceased's Identity Through DNA Test.

The appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Shimoga, in S.C. No.95/2012 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sitaram S/o. Baliram Fating, a retired Maintenance City Survey Officer, was convicted by the Special Court (A.C.B.), Nagpur, in Special...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Recall of Victim for Cross-Examination in POCSO Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Delay. The court held that the accused's right to fair trial includes effective cross-examination, and the trial court's rejection of the recall application was not justified.

The petitioner, Chandrakant @ Kantu, was accused in Special Case (POCSO) No.11/2018 for offences under Sections 366(A) and 376(2)(i)(n) of IPC and Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. v. ESIC — Club Held Not Exempt from ESI Act Coverage. Employees of a club engaged in betting activities are covered under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, as the club is a 'shop' within the meaning of the Act.

The case involves two writ petitions: one by Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. challenging the applicability of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing death by rash driving overturned as prosecution failed to prove murderous intent beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh @ Pintya Ramesh Sabale, was convicted by the learned Second (Ad hoc) Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, for the offence punishab...