Search Results for "urban land"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "urban land"

1806 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1806 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition by MSEDCL Without Due Process — Acquisition of Land for Electricity Sub-Station Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the acquisition of land by MSEB without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is illegal and directed restoration of possession or payment of compensation.

5 Jan 2024

The petitioners, owners of land admeasuring 6685 sq.mtrs at Village Panchpakhadi, Thane, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.

22 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...

High Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under 2013 Act. Compensation Must Be Determined as per Market Value Under Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Without Applying Theory of Dediction from Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as per Section 26 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

27 Mar 2025

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land for widening and four-laning of National Highway No.12-A in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, under The Right t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows State and Claimant Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 30 per sq.m. with 30% Deduction for Development. Court applies belting method and deducts development cost for large land parcel acquired for Nhava-Sheva water supply.

15 Sep 2005

The case involves two appeals arising from the same award dated 30th September 1989 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Raigad at Alibag in La...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Railway's Refusal to Grant NOC for Redevelopment of Cooperative Housing Society. Held that Railway land vests in the President of India and the Railway has no authority to demand NOC for redevelopment on land owned by MHADA.

3 Dec 2020

The petitioners, Vinobha Bhave Nagar Godavari Adhyapak Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and M/s. Nisar Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition und...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Considers Petitions Against Infrastructure Cost Levies by Nagpur Metropolitan Regional Development Authority. The Petitions Raise Constitutional and Statutory Challenges Under Articles 14, 265 and the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966.

15 Sep 2025

The dispute arose from demands for infrastructure cost and STP charges made by the Nagpur Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (NMRDA) against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

KAHC010022932010_1

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challengi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of CIDCO's Lease Cancellation in Tender Dispute. The court held that CIDCO's cancellation was unjustified as the partnership firm's bid was initially accepted, changes were authorized, and no concrete breaches of tender terms were proven, applying principles of promissory estoppel and administrative fairness.

29 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a tender called by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO) on 11.06.2008 for lease of land near ...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)