FERA APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2006
26 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "trust shares"
432 result(s) found
Found 432 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.
14 Dec 2024The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...
- 543
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Succession Act Case — Order Granting Succession Certificate Set Aside for Lack of Notice to All Heirs. Failure to Issue Notice to Appellant Under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 Violates Principles of Natural Justice.
1 Feb 2024The appellant, T. Nagendra Setty, filed an appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, challenging the order dated 30.08.2023 passed ...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Order Against Guarantors in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Recovery Officer Cannot Order Arrest Without Prior Notice and Hearing Under Section 25 of RDDBFI Act, 1993
27 Feb 2023The petitioners, Kishor K. Mehta and Rajesh K. Mehta, were directors and guarantors of Beautiful Diamonds Company Limited, which had availed loan faci...
- 36
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act Case, Granting Independent Tenure Holder Status to Sub-lessees. Sub-lessees under a government lessee for agricultural purposes qualify as tenure holders under Sections 3(9) and 3(17) of the Act, rebutting the presumption under Section 5 Explanation II, and are exempt from lease deed transfer conditions due to agricultural use.
10 Jan 2022The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Uttarakhand dismissing writ petitions filed by the appellants, who were sub-lessees unde...
- 745
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.
14 Dec 2021The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...
- 209
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Perjury Proceedings in Property Dispute — No Prima Facie Case of False Evidence Established Under Section 340 CrPC. Court Hears Accused on Preliminary Issue and Finds Allegations Unsubstantiated.
22 Dec 2018The judgment concerns a Civil Application filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Satyanarayan Nandk...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Valuers in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act as Complainant Failed to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 NI Act is rebuttable and the complainant must prima facie show a legally enforceable debt.
6 Dec 2017The judgment pertains to three criminal applications filed by Ramesh Dahyalal Shah, Yardi Prabhu Consultants & Valuers Pvt. Ltd., and Ashwinkumar Shet...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will Dated 1977 Despite Limitation and Forgery Challenges. Executor Succeeds in Proving Due Execution and Testamentary Capacity of Testator Who Died in 1979.
2 Dec 2016The plaintiff, Suresh Manilal Mehta, filed a petition for probate of a Will dated 16th March 1977 allegedly executed by Rameshchandra Jamnadas Dalal (...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Appointment of Receiver in Suit for Specific Performance — Appellant's Alienation of Property During Pendency of Suit Held Contumacious. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Applied to Protect Plaintiffs' Rights.
30 Nov -0001The appeal arose from an order appointing a Receiver over a property in a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction. The plaintiffs (resp...
- 46
