Search Results for "trivial offences"

305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shailendra Manikrao Bakare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by High Court in PMLA Case — Twin Conditions Under Section 45 Not Satisfied. High Court Erred in Holding Section 50 Statements Inadmissible and Ignoring Rigours of Section 45 PMLA.

The Supreme Court set aside the bail granted by the Patna High Court to Kanhaiya Prasad in a money laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laund...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Patwari in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Ramdas Kalmegh, was a Patwari at Pimpri-Deshmukh, Maharashtra. The complainant, Raghunath Tandale, owned agricultural land and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Murder, Abduction, and Robbery Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Establish Conspiracy Under Section 120-B IPC Despite Lack of Direct Link Between Co-Accused.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Cyrone Rodrigues and Chandrakant Talwar & Pappu @ Appu against their conviction and sentencing by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Identification of Victim and Accused.

The case involves three appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) against their conviction and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Confirms Death Sentence for Four Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case — Conviction Under Sections 396, 397, 302 IPC Upheld. Court Finds Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a dacoity and murder that occurred on the night of 14th February 2009. The prosecution alleged that the four accused, Basavaraj @...