Search Results for "specific performance"

4725 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4725 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved. Concurrent findings of courts below upheld that plaintiff failed to prove agreement and suit was barred by limitation under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Smt. Doshmani w/o. Vasantlal Bahoria, filed a Second Appeal against the judgment and order dated 26.4.2007 passed by the Adhoc District...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Discovery in Specific Performance Suit — Discovery Sought After Issues Settled and Evidence Led, Not Permitted Under CPC Order XI Rule 1A

The appeal arises from a suit filed by NTPC Limited (respondent-plaintiff) in December 2005 seeking specific performance of a contract for supply of 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction When Possession Not Delivered Under Agreement. The court held that a plaintiff not in possession under an agreement to sell cannot restrain the owner from constructing on the property.

The appellant, Shankar Govindlal Patwari, was the owner of an open plot bearing CTS No.3238 admeasuring 59.04 square meters within Dhule Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts. Agreement to Sell Dated 10.1.2003 Validly Enforced Despite Subsequent Sale to Appellant, as Appellant Was Not a Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice.

The dispute pertains to land bearing Gat No.1120 admeasuring 38 Are situated at Mouza Pimpalgaon Raja, Taluka Khamgaon, District Buldana. The plaintif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Written Statement in Specific Performance Suit. Mistake of Counsel Held Not to Prejudice Defendant's Right to Fair Trial — Amendment Allowed as Explanatory and Necessary for Real Controversy.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of contract dated 02.03.2003 against the respondents. During the trial, af...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Specific Performance Suit — Trial Court's Decree Restored. Appellate Court Exceeded Remand Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23-A CPC by Reversing Findings Without Proper Justification.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale filed by the original plaintiff, Mohd. Sardar, against the defendant, Raf...