KAHC010000842011_1
11 Jul 2014The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...
Search Results for "special industrial zone"
399 result(s) found
Found 399 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Santiniketan Construction Case - Appellants Wins Against Demolition Order - High Court's Direction for Demolition and Compensation Set Aside
29 Jan 2026The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Appellants challenging the High Court's order directing demolition of their building in Santiniketan ar...
- 863
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.
11 Apr 1969The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows HUDA's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Section 5A Compliance Upheld. Collector's recommendation not binding on State Government; no discrimination found in acquisition of land for development.
18 Oct 2024The case involves appeals by Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) against the High Court's judgment quashing land acquisition notifications unde...
- 825
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.
30 Sep 2015The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Relocation of BARC Nuclear Reactor Due to Tsunami and Fault Line Concerns. Court Holds No Credible Scientific Evidence of Imminent Danger to Nuclear Installation from Geological Fault Line or Tsunami.
28 Apr 2005The Bombay High Court dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Citizens For A Just Society, a social organization founded by Dr. Usha Meh...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.
14 Feb 2022The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...
- 700
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Drug Manufacturers in Complaint Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act — Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. Complaint filed by Drugs Inspector without prior sanction of the Drug Controller under Section 32 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and without proper investigation, held to be invalid and liable to be quashed.
29 Oct 2018The petitioners, AFD Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Angle French Drugs & Industries Ltd., and their directors, filed two criminal writ petitions under S...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Delhi High Court Order Setting Aside Central Government's Allocation of Raw Pet-Coke. Court Restores Allocation Based on EPCA Recommendations and Production Capacity, Holding That High Court Erred in Interfering with Policy Decisions on Environmental Grounds.
10 Jan 2023The Supreme Court considered appeals against a Delhi High Court judgment that set aside the Central Government's allocation of imported raw pet-coke (...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Metro Line 4 Alignment and Land Acquisition by Private Landowners. Petitioners Contend That MMRDA Lacks Authority Under Metro Railways Act, 1978 and That Acquisition Under MRTP Act Is Invalid Without Environmental Clearances.
30 Mar 2023Two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the implementation and alignment of Metro Railway Line No.4 (ML-4) in Mumbai. P...
- 22
