Search Results for "section 34"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 34"

603 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 603 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Award Was Not in Conflict with Public Policy and Did Not Suffer from Patent Illegality.

19 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Hi Style India Pvt. Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Arbitral A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Consider Crucial Evidence and Breach of Contract Terms Constituted Patent Illegality Under Section 34(2A) of the Act.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, National Co-operative Consumer’s Federation of India Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank of India's Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The Court held that the arbitrator's award of interest on pre-reference period without contractual basis and failure to consider bank's counterclaim amounted to patent illegality and denial of opportunity.

3 Nov 2025

The case involves a petition filed by Bank of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award directing payment of consideration for shares, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The Petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Arbitrator's failure to consider vital evidence and crucial documents renders award patently illegal and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Tripartite Agreement Dispute Over Warehousing Charges — Handwritten Insertion of 'Per Month' Not Binding Without Consent. The court upheld the arbitrator's finding that the handwritten insertion was not part of the agreement and that the award was not contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Jan 2014

The dispute arose from a tripartite agreement dated 18 May 2004 between Essar Oils Limited (Petitioner), Central Warehousing Corporation (Respondent N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Finding of Fraud and Limitation Based on SEBI Circular. The Court held that the Arbitrator's findings on limitation and fraud were plausible and not perverse, and the petition lacked merit under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Jan 2014

The Petitioner, Reliance Securities Limited, a stock broker and member of the National Stock Exchange, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds — Section 34 Application Filed Beyond Limitation Period. Court holds that period of limitation for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from the date of receipt of the original award and is not extended by a subsequent correction application under Section 33.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd, a member of the National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange, had disputes with its constituent, re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Dispute — Compensation Enhancement Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence. Court holds that the Arbitral Tribunal cannot award compensation beyond the Reference Court's award without proper evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two cross-petitions arising out of an arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, concerning compensation for l...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)