Search Results for "royalty charges"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "royalty charges"

207 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Offences Under MMDR Act and IPC. Prosecution Under MMDR Act Requires Complaint by Authorized Officer; Police FIR Without Authority is Illegal.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dealt with a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seekin...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Multiple Criminal Proceedings for Offences Under MMRD Act and IPC; Non-Cognizable Offences Cannot Be Investigated Without Written Complaint by Authorized Officer.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, adjudicated a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

High Court

High Court Quashes MMDR Act Proceedings Initiated by Police in Multiple Petitions; Police Not Authorized Under Section 22 of MMDR Act. Cognizance of Offences Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Cannot Be Taken on Police Report—Only Authorized Persons Can File Complaint.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in MMDR Act Cases Due to Lack of Authorisation. Police Registration of FIR for Mining Offences Without Competent Authority's Complaint Held Invalid Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

6 Feb 2019

A batch of criminal petitions was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Leave and License Dispute — Interim Relief Granted to Licensee Pending Suit. The court held that the licensee had a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favour, and the license was irrevocable under Section 60(b) of the Indian Easements Act, 1882.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Wework India Management Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Desilting Policy Tender Conditions as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. Petitioners Contend Conditions Violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and Disregard Court's Directive in PIL No.143 of 2012.

18 Mar 2019

The High Court of Bombay heard four connected writ petitions challenging certain conditions stipulated in a Government Resolution dated 03.08.2018 iss...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Quashes Criminal Proceedings for MMDR Act Violations as Police cannot Investigate Barred Offences. Proceedings Initiated by Police for Offences under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 22, Allowing Continuation of IPC Investigations.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad adjudicated a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seek...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proving the execution and validity of the agreement to sell, and the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

2 Apr 2024

The appellant, Zainab Rafiullah Shaikh, was the original defendant No.3 in a suit for specific performance filed by the respondent, Puthenveedu Joseph...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.

17 Feb 2025

The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)