Search Results for "revenue mutation"

885 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 885 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Lack of Jurisdictional Satisfaction and Violation of Natural Justice. Deputy Commissioner's order set aside and matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing parties.

The petitioner, Shri Rukmanna S/o Shankar Zunjwadkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings — Emphasizes Mandatory Inquiry Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Third Party Claimants Entitled to Full Inquiry Before Executing Court When They Assert Possession and Interest in Decree Property.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Indubai D. Kothawale and others (the applicants) challenging an order dated 16 October 2023 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Notification and Collector's Order Under Maharashtra Private Forest Act. Land Declared as Forest in 1960 Notification Cannot Be Challenged After Decades; Collector's Suo Motu Order Under Section 22(5) Upheld.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of land in Survey No.245/4B, Kavesar, Thane, challenged an order dated 27 March 2015 passed suo motu by the Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Mutation Dispute — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title, Remedy Lies Before Civil Court. Revenue authorities' mutation proceedings are fiscal inquiries and do not create legal rights; the petitioner must approach the civil court for title disputes.

The petitioner, Ibrahim Khan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) challenging an order passed by the Additional Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Petitioner Fails to Prove Will and Default in Rent Payment. The court held that the petitioner, claiming as a legatee under a will, must prove the will and the tenant's default; mere mutation entry does not confer ownership.

The petitioner, Subhash s/o Pandurang Bagal, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad, dated 14th O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal's Order in Tenancy Dispute Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 70(b) Dismissed as Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Tenancy Relationship.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The petitioners, legal heirs of Laxman Hari Tambe, filed a writ...