Search Results for "re-settlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "re-settlement"

490 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 490 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals by Market Committee in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with Statutory Provisions.

25 Feb 2025

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the Special Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee for Fruits and Vegetables (the appellant) agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Claim for Interest on Delayed Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 2013 — Interest Awarded at 12% Per Annum from Date of Award to Payment. Section 80 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 mandates interest on delayed payment of compensation, and the Court directed payment of interest at 12% per annum from the date of Award until actual payment.

6 Oct 2023

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Hatim Fidaali Rajkotwala and another against the Land Acq...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Claim for Interest on Delayed Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act. Petitioners entitled to statutory interest under Section 80 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for delayed payment of compensation from date of Award till actual payment.

6 Oct 2023

The Petitioners, Hatim Fidaali Rajkotwala and Anr., filed two Writ Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Additional Alternate Land After 49-Year Delay. Writ petition seeking allotment of 80R land under Nazare Project rejected as grossly delayed and lacking explanation for laches.

26 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Nana Narayan Bhalerao (since deceased, through his legal heir Jalindar Nana Bhalerao), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Disbursement of Land Acquisition Compensation Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners Entitled to Compensation Despite Delay in Award and Failure to File Reference Under Section 64.

30 Jun 2023

The petitioners, twelve agriculturists from village Arvi, Taluka Shirur (Ka), District Beed, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Deduction of 10% Compensation from Tribal Landowners in Land Acquisition. Government Resolution dated 15/07/2010 cannot be applied to acquisitions under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

13 Apr 2022

The petitioners, who are tribals and owners of Occupancy Class II lands, challenged the deduction of 10% from their compensation awarded under the Rig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for TDR in DP Road Development Case — Petitioner Entitled to TDR for Roads Developed and Paid For Under DCR 33(7) and 33(8). The court held that the Petitioner is entitled to Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in the form of Floor Space Index (FSI) equivalent to the area of DP Roads developed and paid for by it, and quashed the rejection by the Respondents.

3 Jul 2020

The Petitioner, M/s Siddhi Real Estate Developers, is the owner of land admeasuring approximately 85,778 sq.mtrs. at village Dhokali, Thane. The Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition Declaring Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Award Made After Commencement of 2013 Act Without Taking Possession or Paying Compensation Results in Lapse of Proceeding.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioners, owners of land Gat No. 176 in Khelbar, Jalgaon Jamod, challenged the land acquisition proceeding initiated under Section 6 notificati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Notice Issued to Deceased Person Invalid. The court held that a notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued to a person who had died before the notice is invalid, and since possession was not taken and compensation not paid, the acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Vithoba Ravaji Jadhav (since deceased through legal heir Subhash Vithoba Jadhav), owned land Gat No.422/2 at Vadgaon Bhande, Tal. Daun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons. Notification under Section 4 and Declaration under Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 upheld as acquisition was for public purpose of resettlement of displaced persons.

23 Jun 2010

The petitioners, heirs of Ramchandra Desai @ Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Notificati...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)