WRIT PETITION NOs. 4198 2005, 564 2009, 804 2002,
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "quashing remand order"
630 result(s) found
Found 630 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Revenue’s Appeals Against Single Judge’s Order Quashing Section 153C Notices; Weighs Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Natural Justice Concerns.
22 Jan 2024The present judgment arises from a batch of writ appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order dated 12.08.2022 passed by a Single Judge of the ...
- 53
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in MMDR Act Cases Due to Lack of Authorisation. Police Registration of FIR for Mining Offences Without Competent Authority's Complaint Held Invalid Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.
6 Feb 2019A batch of criminal petitions was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, seek...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Defence Estate Officer in Arbitration Delay Case — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Section 34 Applications. The court held that time spent in pursuing remedy before wrong forum is liable to be excluded under Section 14, and the delay of few days in filing application under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was condonable.
20 Aug 2013The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Defence Estate Officer, Mumbai Circle, against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay Hig...
- 122
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Collector's Suo Motu Revision Under Section 110 of Tenancy Act. Suo Motu Revision Power Under Section 110 of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Is Not Subject to Limitation and Can Be Exercised to Correct Illegal Mutation Entries Made in Violation of Section 43.
17 Mar 2026The petitioner, Morarji Ratnshi Tatariya Suthar, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by ...
- 93
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition Seeking Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC. Accused Challenges Order Rejecting Statutory Bail on Grounds of Non-Filing of Charge Sheet within 90 Days.
21 Apr 2022The petitioner, Comanduru Parthasarathy, an accused in Crime No.82 of 2021 registered by Seshadripuram Police Station for various offences under the I...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of News Broadcaster's Petition Challenging RBI Refusal to Accept Compounding Applications Under Foreign Exchange Management Act. The Court Examines the Compounding Process and the Validity of the 2017 Amendment to Rule 8(2) Barring Compounding When Section 37A Proceedings Are Contemplated.
26 Jun 2018The petitioner, a public limited news broadcasting company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actio...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Application as Time-Barred. Limitation for Filing Application Under Section 34(3) Runs from Receipt of Award; Suit Filed Within Extended 30-Day Period Without Showing Sufficient Cause for Delay Cannot be Entertained.
26 Nov 2019This appeal arose from the dismissal of an arbitration suit filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...
- 81
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Appeal Under Section 341 Cr.P.C. Against Rejection of Application Under Section 195-A Cr.P.C. — CW-19 Alleges Threats by Police and Ex-Minister to Give False Evidence in Murder Trial. Trial Court Dismissed Application Without Considering Mandatory Requirement of Court Complaint Under Section 195 Cr.P.C. for Offences Relating to Judicial Proceedings.
1 Mar 2019The appeal under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) arose from the dismissal of an application filed under Section 195-A Cr...
- 52
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Dissolution of Private University for Non-Compliance with Statutory Appointment Procedure — Visitor's Directions and Dissolution Order Valid as University Failed to Obtain Approval for Chancellor's Appointment. The Court held that the appointment of Chancellor under Section 14(1) of the Chandra Mohan Jha University Act, 2009 requires prior approval of the Visitor, and the University cannot assume deemed approval.
21 Mar 2025The case pertains to the dissolution of CMJ University, a private university established under the Chandra Mohan Jha University Act, 2009 (the Act) by...
- 1362
