Karnataka High Court Passes Judgment in Multiple Motor Accident Claim Appeals
22 Dec 2020...
Search Results for "presiding officer absence"
1035 result(s) found
Found 1035 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award of Compensation to Injured Driver in KSRTC Case — Employer's Failure to Provide Alternate Employment Justifies Compensation Under Industrial Disputes Act. The court held that once an employee is found unfit for his original post due to employment injury, the employer is bound to provide suitable alternate employment or pay compensation under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
4 Apr 2022The petitioner, the Management of KSRTC, challenged the award dated 13.04.2016 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mangalore in Application...
- 86
High Court
High Court Dismisses Petition by Managing Committee Members Challenging Penalty for Non-Compliance with Tribunal Order. Section 63 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 empowers imposition of fine for failure to comply with directions of University or College Tribunal.
26 Feb 2015The writ petition was filed by members of the Managing Committee of Subhedar Ramji Ambedkar Education Society, Wardha, challenging an order dated 17-1...
- 90
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand by Government Labour Officer Fails as Prosecution Fails to Prove Demand and Acceptance Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
10 Feb 2026The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.
1 Mar 2018The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...
- 51
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Delivers Judgment in Motor Accident Claim Appeal Involving Air Force Sergeant Paralyzed in Road Accident. Tribunal's Dismissal of Claim Based on Lack of Complainant's Complaint and Criminal Charge Sheet Challenged.
21 Sep 2021The appellant, a former Sergeant in the Indian Air Force, sustained grievous injuries in a road traffic accident on 03.02.2007, resulting in 100% disa...
- 41
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Lok Adalat for Abuse of Process. Court finds that a compromise decree passed in Lok Adalat without proper verification of parties and without ensuring free consent is a nullity and liable to be set aside under Article 227 of the Constitution.
21 Feb 2014The petitioner, Smt. Akkubai, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of a compromise decree da...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Remand Extension Order in UAPA Case for Lack of Jurisdiction — Magistrate Not Empowered to Extend Remand Beyond 15 Days Without Production of Accused. Default bail order set aside as premature.
21 Apr 2023The petitioners, five individuals arrested in Crime No.71/2022 registered by Panambur Police Station for offences under Sections 121, 121A, 120B, 153A...
- 156
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement in Forest Department Termination Case — Workman Entitled to Reinstatement Despite Procedural Lapses as Termination Violated Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
14 Jun 2023The petitioners, the Chief Conservator of Forest, Zilla Panchayat, Deputy Conservator of Forest, and Range Forest Officer, Kalaburagi, challenged the ...
- 83
High Court
High Court of Bombay examines challenge to Industrial Court order that dismissed revision applications against Labour Court’s dismissal of complaints alleging unfair labour practices under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act. The lower courts held that complaints were not maintainable under Item 1 of Schedule IV, being more appropriately under Item 6, and that termination of services was by efflux of time under contract, not retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.
26 Oct 2016The dispute arose from complaints filed by sixteen women packers employed on temporary basis by a pharmaceutical company since 1985. They alleged that...
- 34
