Search Results for "notice under Section 32(2)"

274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part in Development Charge Levy Dispute. Development Charge on Already Developed Land Held Illegal Under Section 124 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Sir Gangadharrao Chitnavis Memorial Medical Research Trust, a charitable trust, owned Plot No. 56 at Temple Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Barred by Limitation and Failure to Prove Possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, which affirmed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Trade Union to File as Operational Creditor Under IBC — Workers' Dues Constitute Operational Debt. Trade Union, Being a Body Corporate Under Trade Unions Act, Can Represent Workmen Collectively for Insolvency Proceedings.

The appeal arose from a long-standing dispute concerning a jute mill that had been closed permanently on 07.03.2014. The appellant, JK Jute Mill Mazdo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl in POCSO Case. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(f), 377, 363, 364, 367, 201 IPC and POCSO Act affirmed based on DNA evidence and circumstantial evidence.

The case pertains to the kidnapping, rape, unnatural sex, and murder of a 5-year-old girl by her neighbor, the appellant Dattatraya @ Datta Ambo Rokad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Nominal Sale Deed and Bank's Securitization Proceedings. Civil Court's jurisdiction barred under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for challenging bank's attachment notice under Section 13(2).

The appellants, Smt. Savita Bhagwantrao Patil and Chaitanya Bhagwantrao Patil, were the original plaintiffs in a suit filed before the 6th Joint Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Cheque Dishonour Cases for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Magistrate at Mumbai had no jurisdiction as no part of cause of action arose within its territorial limits under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The Bombay High Court considered a group of applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of process issued...