Search Results for "negligent act"

2494 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2494 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304(A) and 337 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove rash and negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Shivaji Santu Zanzad, a driver of a PMT bus, challenging his conviction under Sections 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Owner of Uninsured Truck in Motor Accident Claim. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.82,200 to Rs.1,50,000 for Death of Pillion Rider Due to Rash Driving Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 22/2/1995 where Nirmala, a 57-year-old woman, died as a pillion rider on a moped after being hit by a truck. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Deduction of Contributory Negligence and Proper Application of Multiplier. Claimants' Cross Objection Dismissed as No Evidence of Negligence of Other Vehicle.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a deceased bachelor who died in a vehicular accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Culpability for BMW Hit-and-Run: State Appeals Against High Court's Reduction of Conviction from Section 304 Part II to Section 304A IPC. The Core Issue is Whether the Accused Had Knowledge of Likely Death to Attract the Graver Offence.

The case arose from a fatal motor accident involving a BMW car driven by the respondent, Sanjeev Nanda, on the night of 9/10 January 1999 in New Delhi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Motor Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash Driving. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act as No Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving Was Adduced.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 16 April 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Tempo Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs.18,17,000/- with 9% Interest Affirmed as Just and Fair.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident on 08/01/2013, where the deceased Vikas Bharne was riding a motorcycle and was hit by a tempo coming fro...