Search Results for "motor vehicles offences"

356 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 356 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Minor Deceased. Compensation of Rs. 4,50,000 Upheld as Vehicle Involvement and Negligence Proved Despite Delay in FIR.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a minor deceased, Mehulbhai Thakorbhai Patel, who died due to injuries sustained i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Rash Driving Case — Death Caused by Negligent Driving of Mini Truck. Concurrent findings of fact based on credible evidence cannot be interfered with in revision.

The applicant, Pradeep N. Shetgaonkar, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) on 01/10/2012 for offences under Sections 279, 338,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Bus Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash and Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The petitioner, Medappa, was the driver of a bus that met with an accident on 28 July 2000 at about 9:30 a.m., resulting in the death of eight passeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Employee. Deceased conductor returning on scooter from depot held equally negligent; compensation reduced by 50% with proper deductions under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, dated 13/12/2005 in Claim Petition No.301/2001, awarding compensation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence in Rash Driving Case Due to Mitigating Circumstances — Concurrent Findings of Guilt Under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 MV Act Upheld but Sentence Modified to Period Already Undergone.

The applicant, Deepak Babusing Pardeshi, was convicted by the trial court and the appellate court for offences under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 of ...