Search Results for "mineral development"

338 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 338 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Twelve Criminal Petitions Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Seeking Quashing of Mining Offence Proceedings. Petitions Sought to Quash Proceedings Under Sections 379, 511 IPC and Various Provisions of MMRD Act and KMMC Rules, Raising Common Question of Law.

Twelve criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by Cement Company Seeking Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition — Market Value Determined Based on Comparable Sales and Potential Use

The appellant, M/s Bagalkot Cement & Industries Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, owned land in Bagalkot that was acquired b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010218752018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Desilting Policy Tender Conditions as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. Petitioners Contend Conditions Violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and Disregard Court's Directive in PIL No.143 of 2012.

The High Court of Bombay heard four connected writ petitions challenging certain conditions stipulated in a Government Resolution dated 03.08.2018 iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes State Licensing Order for Petroleum Products Due to Lack of Delegated Authority. State Government Cannot Issue Order Under Essential Commodities Act When Central Government Has Already Occupied the Field.

The Petitioners, an association of licence holders from oil companies for sale of petroleum products, challenged the Maharashtra Petroleum Products De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Occupancy Certificate and Refund of Security Deposit in CIDCO Development Dispute. Court holds that the developer failed to comply with development control regulations and that the petition was not maintainable due to disputed facts and alternative remedies.

The petitioners, La'BuilDe Associates and its managing partner Bhagvanji Raiyani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...