Search Results for "jail rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "jail rule"

1733 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1733 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Parole Plea of TADA Convict Due to Specific Bar Under Maharashtra Prison Rules. Rule 4(13) read with Rule 19 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 disqualifies prisoners convicted under TADA from regular parole, and the Supreme Court's decision in Asfaq v. State of Rajasthan is distinguishable as it did not involve similar state-specific rules.

2 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Mo. Hasan Mehndi Hasan Sheikh, a convict serving life imprisonment at Central Jail, Amravati, was convicted for various offences inclu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Escape from Custody Under Section 224 IPC When Prisoner Surrenders Voluntarily. Voluntary surrender after expiry of furlough period does not constitute escape from custody as the prisoner was not in custody at the time of alleged offence.

27 Apr 2022

The applicant, Virendrasingh Ramprakashsingh Khairwar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. On 21 March 2017, he wa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority mechanically recited grounds without considering detenu's custody status.

27 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Rohit Sidram Khatal, challenged an order of detention dated 17/3/2020 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur under Section 3 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Convicts Despite Past Overstay, Emphasizes Reformative Purpose of Furlough. Furlough is a right of a prisoner and cannot be denied solely on ground of past overstay without considering subsequent good conduct and period of incarceration.

26 Nov 2019

The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed by convicts Satish Shankarrao Shinde and Nagnath Bapurao Sontakke, challenging the rejectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Criminal Appeals Against Conviction in MCOCA Special Case No.1 of 2006. Accused-Appellants Were Convicted Under Various IPC and MCOCA Sections for Kidnapping for Ransom and Murder; Appeals Heard and Disposed by Common Judgment.

6 Aug 2018

The case involved the abduction, ransom demand, and murder of Sagar Sahani, son of businessman Satinder Sahani. On 14 August 2005, Sagar was abducted ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Concurrent Running of Subsequent Sentence with Life Imprisonment in Absence of Consecutive Direction. Default Rule Under Section 427(1) CrPC Mandates Concurrency When Subsequent Court Does Not Specify Consecutive Running.

23 Aug 2013

The petitioner, Vasudeo Shankar Rajput @ Kanjarbhat, was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Convict to Appear for LL.B. Examination — Right to Education of Prisoners Upheld. Court Directs Release on Furlough or Police Escort for Examination Under Article 21 of Constitution.

16 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Amit Gajanan Gandhi, was a convict serving life imprisonment under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, since July 1998. He had...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Respondent to Decide Prisoner's Transfer Application Within Four Weeks — Pending Application for Transfer to Open Jail Must Be Decided Expeditiously.

18 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Sk. Iqbal Sk. Gayasuddin, a prisoner in Aurangabad Jail, filed a Criminal Writ Petition through a communication from jail, which was r...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Legislative Privilege Conviction; Considers Maintainability and Procedural Fairness Under Constitutional Provisions. Breach of Privilege Motion Based on Alleged Unparliamentary Remarks Against Ministers Led to Imprisonment Order; Questions of Natural Justice, Right to Counsel, and Judicial Review Raised Under Articles 21 and 226.

4 Jul 2006

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA — Detention Order Quashed for Non-Consideration of Representation. The court held that failure to consider the detenu's representation before expiry of detention period violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

22 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Dina Shah, wife of the detenu Vipul Vinod Shah, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before th...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)