Bombay High Court Directs Respondent to Decide Prisoner's Transfer Application Within Four Weeks — Pending Application for Transfer to Open Jail Must Be Decided Expeditiously.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 20
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sk. Iqbal Sk. Gayasuddin, a prisoner in Aurangabad Jail, filed a Criminal Writ Petition through a communication from jail, which was registered as Criminal Writ Petition No. 1125 of 2009. The limited grievance was that his application dated 24.7.2009 for transfer to the Open Jail at Paithan was pending and not decided by the respondent, the State of Maharashtra. The court appointed Smt. M.B. Gangwal as counsel for the petitioner. The respondent filed an affidavit in reply by Bharat Mahadeo Bhosale, Additional Superintendent, Central Prison, Aurangabad, stating at paragraph 7 that the application was pending consideration before the Inspector of Prisons, Pune and would be decided as per law. The court, noting that the application was pending, held that interest of justice would be served by directing the respondent to decide the application. The petition was allowed, directing the respondent to decide the application within four weeks from the date of the order and communicate the decision to the petitioner. Rule was made absolute with no order as to costs. The court quantified fees payable to the appointed counsel at Rs. Two Thousand.

Headnote

A) Prison Law - Transfer of Prisoner - Pending Application - The petitioner, a prisoner, submitted an application dated 24.7.2009 for transfer to Open Jail, which remained undecided. The court directed the respondent to decide the application within four weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner, holding that interest of justice requires expeditious disposal of pending applications (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent should be directed to decide the petitioner's pending application for transfer from Aurangabad Jail to Open Jail at Paithan.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Respondent directed to decide the application of the petitioner within four weeks from today and communicate the decision to the petitioner. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs. Fees quantified at Rs. Two Thousand for appointed counsel.

Law Points

  • Prisoner's right to have pending application decided expeditiously
  • duty of prison authorities to decide applications within reasonable time
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 134

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1125 of 2009

2010-01-18

P.V. Hardas, Shrihari P. Davare

Smt. M.B. Gangwal (for petitioner), Shri K.S. Patil (APP for respondent)

Sk. Iqbal Sk. Gayasuddin

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking direction to decide pending application for transfer to open jail

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondent to decide petitioner's application dated 24.7.2009 for transfer from Aurangabad Jail to Open Jail at Paithan

Filing Reason

Petitioner's application for transfer to open jail remained undecided by the respondent

Issues

Whether the respondent should be directed to decide the petitioner's pending application for transfer to open jail

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that his application dated 24.7.2009 for transfer to Open Jail at Paithan is pending and not decided Respondent in affidavit stated that the application is pending consideration before Inspector of Prisons, Pune and will be decided as per law

Ratio Decidendi

When a prisoner's application is pending before the authorities, interest of justice requires that the application be decided expeditiously. The court can direct the authorities to decide the application within a specified time frame.

Judgment Excerpts

The limited grievance of the petitioner is that he had submitted an application dated 24.7.2009 for his transfer from Aurangabad Jail to the Open Jail at Paithan. Since the application is pending, according to us, interest of justice would be subserved by directing the respondent to decide the said application. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to decide the application of the petitioner, within four weeks from today and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner.

Procedural History

Petitioner sent communication from jail which was registered as Criminal Writ Petition. Court appointed counsel for petitioner. Notice issued to respondent. Respondent filed affidavit in reply. Petition heard finally at admission stage.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Respondent to Decide Prisoner's Transfer Application Within Four Weeks — Pending Application for Transfer to Open Jail Must Be Decided Expeditiously.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Retirement Age Dispute — Upholds Labour Court's Finding on Date of Birth Correction Based on Government Gazette. The Industrial Court exceeded its revisional jurisdiction under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act...