Search Results for "interlocutory order challenge"

1116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Alleging Illegal Demolition of Dwelling House and Seeking Compensation Under KMC Act, 1976. Allegations Include Backdating of Notices, Lack of Opportunity, and Collusion Between BBMP Officials and Private Respondent.

Background: The petitioner, a central government employee, purchased a residential property in Doddanekundi, Bengaluru, in 2005 from Dr. Suryakumar Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Appellate Court's Order in Redevelopment Dispute. Interim Relief Granted for Possession of Flats in Ready Building Despite Opposition from Some Members.

The writ petition was filed by a cooperative housing society ('Godi Kamgar Griha Sanstha Ltd.') and its developer ('Bharat Infrastructure & Engineerin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 21 of NIA Act as Not Maintainable Against Interlocutory Order. The court held that an order on an interlocutory application under Section 20 of the NIA Act is not a final judgment and thus not appealable under Section 21 of the Act.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (NIA Act) by four appellants, Irfan Pasha, W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action. Plaint Must Contain Material Facts Constituting Complete Cause of Action; Mere Filing of Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff to Interim Relief.

The case involves an appeal against an order rejecting the plaint in a suit for specific performance. The appellants, who were members of an associati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revision Against Dismissal of Suit for Default, Restores Suit on Condition of Costs. Order 9 Rule 9 CPC does not bar a fresh suit when the earlier suit was dismissed for default under Order 9 Rule 3 CPC, as the bar applies only to dismissals under Order 9 Rule 8 CPC.

The petitioners, as plaintiffs, filed a civil suit O.S.No.172 of 2018 before the District Munsif Court, Tindivanam, seeking relief. The suit was dismi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Restores Suit Dismissed as Withdrawn Without Consent of All Plaintiffs in Representative Suit Under Order I Rule 8 CPC. Suit filed under Order I Rule 8 CPC cannot be withdrawn by some plaintiffs without consent of all and without court permission.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs No.5, 7, and 9, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Tenant Defendants in Possession Suit, Sets Aside Injunction. Court holds that tenants in possession cannot be injuncted without a decree for possession, and a suit for injunction simpliciter is maintainable against a landlord.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order of the Learned Single Judge dated 6th September 2021. The Appellant in Appeal No.551 of 2019...