Search Results for "gratuity provision"

493 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 493 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Lumpsum Compensation to Part-time Sweeper with 41 Years of Service in Lieu of Regularization and Retiral Benefits. Court held that in absence of absorption policy and due to abolition of posts, lumpsum compensation of Rs.7,50,000 is appropriate in lieu of all service benefits.

The petitioner, Parasram Ranganath Gaikwad, worked as a Part-time Sweeper in the Veterinary Hospital of Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, from 7 June 1983 u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition for Pensionary Benefits with Interest. Delay in Payment of Pension by Municipal Corporation Entitles Employee to Interest at 6% Per Annum from Date of Retirement.

The petitioner, Dr. Dinkar Sadashivrao Deshpande, a retired employee of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition seeking a directio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Direction to Consider Compassionate Appointment for Son of Deceased Railway Employee. CAT Erred in Refusing to Follow Railway Board Circular on Second Marriage as Upheld by Bombay High Court.

The Union of India (Railways) filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 6 March 2014 and 26 August 2014 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Navy Pension Regulation Denying Condonation for Voluntary Discharge. Regulation 82(a) of Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964, held valid and not violative of Articles 14, 21, 300A as it applies uniformly to sailors discharged at their own request.

The petitioners, six former sailors of the Indian Navy, were discharged from service on compassionate grounds. They had served between 14 and 15 years...