Search Results for "fatal stab"

253 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 253 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the prosecution successfully proved the conspiracy and murder beyond reasonable doubt, relying on motive, last seen, and recovery of weapons.

The case pertains to the murder of a young girl, Monika Dashrath Kirnapure, on 11.03.2011 near KDK College, Nagpur. The appellants, Krunal Jaiswal, Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 20.12.1995 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, in Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present appeal was filed by Babu Sakharam Dive, Laxman Raoji Dive, and Tryambak Raoji Dive (original accused nos. 1, 2, and 4) challenging the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Witnesses Turned Hostile and Medical Evidence Did Not Support the Alleged Incident.

The appellant, Imtiyaz A. Rahiman Inamdar, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences punishable under Sections 302 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Established Despite Acquittal of Some Accused.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from the same judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, Dist. Nanded, convicting the appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Material Contradictions and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 326 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Pandhari Waghmare and Pushpa Waghmare, were convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for an offence under Section 326 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji @Shiva Shrimant Sonawane, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, in Sessions Case No. 440 of 2001 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Common Intention. Conviction of Accused No.1 under Section 304-II IPC for Causing Death by Negligent Act Sustained.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment and order dated 20.01.2009 passed by the Principal Sessions Court, Bangalore Rural, Bangalore, in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for murder of Shantabai Potdar, relying on last seen evidence, recovery of weapons, and motive.

The case pertains to the murder of Shantabai Potdar, who was found dead in her residential quarter on 25.01.2008. The appellants, Ajit Ashokrao Garje ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The case involves three appellants, Bablya Baliram Madhvi, Namdeo Padu Gaikwad, and Sanjay Arjun Ahire, who were convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessi...