Search Results for "externment order quashed"

235 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Accused in Karnataka Police Act Case Due to Non-Satisfaction of Statutory Conditions. Externment Under Sections 55 and 56 Requiring Three Convictions Within Three Years Not Met as Offences Spanned Eight Years and Were All Closed by Fines.

The petitioner, a resident of Bailhongal, challenged an externment order dated 28.07.2023 passed by the Assistant Commissioner cum-Sub-Divisional Magi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Notice Against Advocate in Bombay Police Act Case — Notice Issued Without Proper Application of Mind and Based on Vague Allegations. Section 56(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 Requires Subjective Satisfaction Based on Material, Not Mere Police Reports.

The petitioner, Sangram s/o Janardhan Tupe, a practicing advocate in Beed, challenged a notice dated 26-7-2010 issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Externment Order Under Section 56(1)(b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Set Aside as Authorities Did Not Consider Whether Lesser Restrictions Would Suffice.

The petitioner, Abasaheb Balasaheb Warkhade, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging an externment order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Maharashtra Police Act for Lack of Continuous Activity. Single FIR for Offences Under Indian Penal Code Not Sufficient to Invoke Section 56(1)(bb) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Aamna Bi Shiekh Pir Mohd Sheikh, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone 3, Nagpur, under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Verify Secret Statements Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid, Making Detention Order Unsustainable.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Dipak alias D. Baba Kashinath Kamble, challenged a detention order dated 7 August 2015 issued by the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Externment Under Karnataka Police Act, 1963. Issues of Natural Justice and Mandatory Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 55(b) Considered.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru adjudicated a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an externmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 for Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider That Petitioner Was on Bail and Could Be Prosecuted Under Regular Law, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

The petitioner, Santosh Tukaram Chavan, was detained under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...