KAHC010480352008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "exclusion order"
2795 result(s) found
Found 2795 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.
14 Feb 2022The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...
- 707
Supreme Court
Jurisdictional Limits on State Interference in Land Rights: State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012
6 Feb 2026The case arose from a dispute involving land/tenancy rights and administrative interference by State authorities in West Bengal. The High Court had se...
- 346
High Court
Karnataka High Court Adjudicates upon Writ Petitions Challenging Re-Assessment Proceedings for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2007-08. Court Analyzes Whether Notices are Barred by Limitation and Whether Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts.
19 Dec 2023The petitioner, EIT Services India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Hewlett Packard Globalsoft Private Limited), a company engaged in export of software services a...
- 46
High Court
- 33
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.
24 Mar 2023This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...
- 367
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Not Maintainable in Arbitration Reference Case. Full Bench holds that an order under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 referring parties to arbitration is not appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, as the Arbitration Act is a self-contained code.
27 Nov 2014The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to decide a reference on the maintainability of an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Paten...
- 152
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union's Appeal in Customs Duty Refund Suit; Civil Court Jurisdiction Barred Due to Statutory Remedy Under Sea Customs Act. The Court Held That Liability to Pay Customs Duty Is Not a Common Law Liability, and the Act Provides a Complete Machinery for Redress, Impliedly Excluding Civil Court Jurisdiction Unless Exceptional Circumstances Exist.
1 Sep 1969The case concerned a suit for refund of customs duty levied on the import of newsprint. The plaintiff, A.V. Narasimhalu, imported 43 reels of newsprin...
- 36
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Revision Against Trial Court’s Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Arising Out of Suit Challenging Municipal Demolition Notices. Suit Raises Question on Applicability of Bar of Civil Court Jurisdiction Under Section 433A of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.
21 Nov 2025The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by a tenant occupying a shop structure in Nashik. The plaintiff claimed that the private defendants, who pur...
- 32
High Court
- 29
