Search Results for "eviction grounds"

1031 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1031 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Landlord-Tenant Consent Order Dispute: Ownership and Eviction Battle Over Dilapidated Property. Supreme Court sets aside High Court's decision, reaffirming tenant does not gain ownership based on the consent order of 1979.

A legal dispute between a landlord and tenant, which started as an eviction case, culminated in a consent order in 1979. Despite settling, the tenant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision by Tenant Company in Eviction Suit Based on Landlord's Reasonable and Bonafide Requirement. Transfer of Shares by Tenant Company to Co-owner Does Not Constitute Subletting Under Section 16(1)(e) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant company (M/s V. Prabha & Co. Pvt. Ltd.) and another party against the judgment and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Bench's Order Setting Aside Rejection of Plaint in Eviction Suit. Transfer of Property Pending Suit Does Not Extinguish Landlord's Cause of Action Under Section 16(1)(a) and (b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a civil writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the original tenant, Ratnamala Mohan Aklujkar, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Issue of PP Act Overriding Rent Control Acts to Three-Judge Bench. Constitution Bench in Ashoka Marketing (1990) 4 SCC 406 held PP Act prevails; two-judge bench in Suhas H. Pophale (2014) 4 SCC 657 carved exceptions; conflict referred for determination.

The batch of civil appeals arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the Life Insurance Corporation of India under the Public Premises (Eviction of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree for Subletting Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Landlord Proved Subletting as Tenants Had No Control Over Suit Shop and Sub-Tenants Were in Exclusive Possession Under Section 16(1)(e)(ii) of M.R.C. Act.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (applicants) against the judgments and decrees of eviction passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging Mumbai Port Trust's Summary Eviction Notices Under Bye-law No.9. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Bye-law No.9 Ultra Vires Public Premises Act and Violated Natural Justice.

In a batch of writ petitions, occupants of structures at Reay Road, Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged eviction notices issued by the Mumbai Port Trust on 06...