Search Results for "development plan rejection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "development plan rejection"

506 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members — No Agreement of Sale Established, Suit Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove any valid agreement for sale of flats, and the suit was time-barred under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

10 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Vardhaman Developers Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for sale of flats in a cooperative hou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Arbitral Award in Slum Redevelopment Agreement Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Setting Aside of Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Sep 2019

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Cancellation of Dharavi Redevelopment Tender and Upholds Fresh Tender Process. The court held that the State's decision to cancel the earlier tender and re-tender was a policy decision based on changed circumstances and not arbitrary, and that the petitioner had no vested right to the award of the contract.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioner, SecLink Technologies Corporation, a company incorporated in Seychelles and lead member of a consortium, challenged the cancellation of...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Reviews Writ Petition in Defence NOC and Commencement Certificate Dispute — Petitioners Challenge MCGM Refusal to Issue Further Commencement Certificate for Cessed Building Redevelopment Near Mazagaon Dock. Writ Petition Seeks Certiorari Against Orders Dated 18 April 2018 and 4 May 2018 and Mandamus for Commencement Certificate, Relying on Absence of NOC Requirement and Applicability of Official Secrets Act Notification.

9 Dec 2022

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by five petitioners, including individual landowners and a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Floors Constructed Without Approval. Court holds that occupants of illegally constructed floors cannot claim violation of natural justice when notices were served on the owner/developer and society, and the BMC is not precluded from acting on glaring illegalities beyond the scope of a prior writ petition.

11 Sep 2024

The Petitioner, an occupant of Flat No.801 on the 8th floor of Shivanjali Co-operative Housing Society building, challenged a notice dated 12th June 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Public Interest Litigation Challenging Lavasa Hill Station Project and Statutory Approvals. Petition Raises Issues of Compliance with Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Special Regulations for Hill Station Development, and Approval of Water Weirs on Varasgaon Dam Backwaters.

26 Feb 2022

The judgment under consideration stems from a Public Interest Litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petitioner, a legal ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Application of Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC to Suit by Non‑Party Seeking Declaration That Compromise Decree is Not Binding. The appellant, a religious math, challenged the rejection of its plaint which alleged that a compromise decree was fraudulent and collusive, thus not binding on it.

18 Mar 2025

The dispute centered on a property originally allotted to S. Narayana by the Bengaluru Development Authority in 1973, with a sale deed executed in 199...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Government Resolution Dated 12 March 2024 on Direct Benefit Transfer Subsidy Scheme. Petitioners Allege Resolution Deletes Five Items from 2016 DBT List and Routes Procurement Through Public Sector Undertakings Without Following Mandatory 2018 Procedure.

22 Jul 2025

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay concerned a writ petition and a public interest litigation challenging Government Resolution ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Petitioner's Writ Petition in Building Permission Dispute — Municipal Authority Cannot Adjudicate Third Party Access Claims. The court held that a municipal council, while deciding a building permission application, cannot entertain a third party's claim regarding access and refuse permission by adjudicating upon the issue of access.

11 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Amina Bi Shaikh, owned a property in Bicholim, Goa and applied for building permission to the Chief Officer of Bicholim Municipal...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)