Search Results for "detention order challenge"

673 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 673 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Sand Smuggler Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention set aside as detaining authority failed to consider custody and lack of public order impact.

The petitioner, Shubham Balasaheb Kardule, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. The court held that a 34-day delay between the proposal and the detention order, without proper explanation, vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Balaji Hanumant Pawar, challenged a detention order dated 10th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under Section 3(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Recital of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Relevant Material Not Considered.

The petitioner, Rupesh Laxman Gaikwad, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Representation Remained Unattended for Over Three Months, Violating Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5).

The petitioner, Premchand @ Babu Punjabi @ Tatu Manohar Dhakani, was detained under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was on bail and conditions ensured no prejudicial activity.

The petitioner, Intezar Umar Daraj Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 31st October 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mum...