Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"

353 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Writ Petition Concerning Lapsing of Land Reservation. Petitioners Claim Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Was Not Acted Upon by Authorities, Leading to Relief Sought.

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking a declaration that the reservation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Construction Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' claim of non-compliance with Section 126(4) MRTP Act fails as award was passed under Land Acquisition Act and possession taken long ago.

The petitioners, owners of land in Latur, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Municipal Council for construction of a development plan roa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Overruling of Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Lucknow Development Authority's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Possession Taken Prior to 2013 Act Precludes Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2). Twin Conditions of Non-Possession and Non-Payment Must Be Satisfied for Lapse; Possession Taken in 2003 Vests Land in State.

The case involves an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 03.07.2017, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final D...