Search Results for "commercial tax officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "commercial tax officer"

1291 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1291 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in VAT Discount Deduction Case — Reassessment Order Set Aside Following Binding Precedent. The court held that discounts allowed to customers after sale via credit notes are deductible under Section 30 of the KVAT Act read with Rule 31 of the KVAT Rules, and the reassessment under Section 39(2) was barred by limitation.

16 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s Pratham Motors Private Limited, a dealer in cars, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India cha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

12 Jun 2015

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows KSRTC Appeal in Property Tax Reassessment Case — Reassessment Notice After 14 Years Held Time-Barred. Commissioner's Power to Reopen Assessment Under Section 112-A(4) of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Must Be Exercised Within a Reasonable Period of 3 Years.

10 Jan 2025

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) appealed against a Single Judge order that upheld the Commissioner's power to reopen property t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Answers Reference Against Assessee in Sales Tax Case — Delivery Orders Not Documents of Title. Delivery orders issued by bankers against airways bills are not documents of title to goods and are not negotiable under section 2(4) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930.

22 Jul 2005

The judgment involves multiple Sales Tax References under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, where the common question of law was whether delivery orders...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.

11 Aug 2016

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Property Tax Classification for Marriage Halls in BBMP Rules 2009 — Rule 3(v) Not Ultra Vires or Discriminatory. The court held that classification of marriage/community halls as a separate category for property tax under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 is reasonable and not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

24 Oct 2013

This batch of writ petitions challenged the validity of Rule 3(v) of the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) Property Tax Rules, 2009, which cla...

High Court

High Court Allows Revision in KVAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Assessee Entitled to Compute ITC on Books of Account and Claim Rebate for Research Division Purchases. The court held that the assessee could compute input tax credit based on books of account under Sections 11, 14, 17 of KVAT Act and was entitled to rebate for purchases by its ancillary research division.

26 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Reopening of Assessments Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Reopening Based on Change of Opinion and Non-Disclosure of Material Facts Held Invalid. The court held that reassessment notices issued without tangible material and based on a change of opinion are invalid, and that the assessee's failure to disclose primary facts is a prerequisite for invoking the proviso to Section 147.

19 Jan 2024

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by corporate assessees challenging the reopening of their income tax assessments for the assessment ...

High Court

downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985

5 Mar 2026

The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Orders Under Section 179 of Income Tax Act Against Non-Executive Director. Court Emphasizes That in Writ Jurisdiction, the Decision-Making Process Takes Precedence Over Merits.

10 Jul 2012

The petitioner, a 77-year-old former non-executive director of Metroni Drugs Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 6 January 201...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)