Search Results for "builders/developers"

659 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 659 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Challenges AGRC Orders Quashing Acceptance of Slum Rehabilitation Proposal by Landowner. Petitioner Contends AGRC Exceeded Jurisdiction and Misconstrued Circular 144A Requirements.

The petitioner, a charitable trust and owner of the subject property, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging two orders of the Apex Griev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court dispenses with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to written consent and no objections from authorities.

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction No. 340 of 2014 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under the Companies Act, 1956. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration Application Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Clause 32 of Work Order Held to Contain Valid Arbitration Agreement Despite Ambiguous Wording.

The applicant, M/s. Jay Bhagwati Construction Co., a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Landowner's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Validity. Clause 18 of Development Agreement Held as Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Reversing High Court's Dismissal of Section 11 Application.

The dispute originated from a Development Agreement dated 29.05.2014 between the appellant landowner and respondent developer for construction of an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Dispute — Petitioner's Rights as Agreement Holder Ignored. Unilateral Conveyance Granted Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, Gayatri Construction, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 15 November 2022 and corrigendum dated 20 December 2022 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Registration of Deed Beyond Limitation Period by Excluding Time Taken for Stamp Duty Adjudication — Time Spent Before Stamp Authorities Must Be Excluded Under Sections 23 and 25 of Registration Act, 1908

The petitioner, V. H. Property Solution LLP, executed a Deed of Conveyance on 06.10.2015 and presented it to the Stamp Duty Authorities on 10.12.2015,...