Search Results for "band dispute"

188 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 188 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Promotion Claim of Employee in Gujarat Maritime Board — Seniority and Promotion Rights Upheld. Court directs consideration of promotion from the date junior was promoted, applying principle of equality and non-arbitrariness under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Ashok Ijjatray Anjaria, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Gujarat High Court against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal Order in Trap Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Petitioner Reinstated with Back Wages as Disciplinary Proceedings Based on Unsubstantiated Trap and Non-Examination of Key Witnesses Violated Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sri M.S. Kadkol, was a government employee who was dismissed from service based on a trap case. The trap was laid on a complaint dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Ganpat Shingade. The appellants, including his wife Jyoti, were convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Student's Petition for Readmission in MBBS Course Due to Medical Grounds — Directions Issued to Respondents to Consider Fresh Admission in Accordance with Rules and Regulations.

The petitioner, Miss Firdos Vahajuddin Ansari, a student aged about 20 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Retraction of Statement and Bail Conditions Ignored, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Bittu Choith Harchandani, challenged a detention order dated 16.4.2015 passed by the second respondent under Section...