Search Results for "arbitrary sanction"

1244 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1244 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 943 OF 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a combined proceeding, dealt with a batch of writ petitions, special leave petitions, and contempt petitions invoking A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2720 OF 2013

The writ petitions were filed by municipal employee unions and individuals challenging the legality and constitutional validity of provisions of the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge by CFS Operators to Customs Public Notices. Petition Under Article 226 Seeks Quashing of Notices Allegedly Imposing Unlawful Restrictions on Container Freight Stations.

The petitioners, comprising thirteen Container Freight Station (CFS) operators and thirteen individual directors, filed a writ petition under Article ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Accused No.7 in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice. Failure to Prove Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Leads to Setting Aside of Summoning Order.

The petitioner, Prasad S/o Veerayya Kulkarni, who was accused No.7 in C.C.No.790/2016 pending before the Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Nippani, filed a cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Release of Contractual Payment Due to Disputed Facts. Court holds that disputed questions of fact regarding work completion and measurement cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. GVPR Engineers Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction in the nat...