Search Results for "amended plaint"

1305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Limitation Plea in Suit Alleging Fraud and Late Delivery of Goods Shipped Under Bill of Lading. Defendants Seek Dismissal of Suit on Grounds of One-Year Limitation Period Under Article III(6) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

(1) Background: The plaintiff, a Korean company, entered into a contract with Indian exporters for the purchase of cold rolled steel sheets to be ship...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside for Ignoring Compromise Decree. Plaintiff's Sale Deed Upheld as Valid Despite Prior Partition, as Compromise Decree Confirmed Shankar's Half Share and Right to Sell.

The appellant, Dagdu Rangnath Shingan, filed a second appeal challenging the concurrent findings of the trial court and first appellate court which di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — No Fraud or Collusion Found in Consent Terms Filed by Counsel. Consent decree upheld as valid and binding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioners, Dhanaji Kashinath Shendkar and others, filed writ petitions challenging a consent decree passed in a suit for specific performance. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance of Granted Land Subject to Non-Alienation Condition. Court Examines Whether Agreement to Sell Executed During Non-Alienation Period is Void Under Karnataka SC/ST Act, 1978.

The civil revision petition arose from an order of the trial court rejecting the petitioners' application to reject the plaint in a suit for specific ...