Search Results for "advertising"

427 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 427 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Defendant's marks 'Ultraplus Cement', 'Ultra HiTouch', and 'UltraPower' held deceptively similar to registered 'UltraTech' marks under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and another, filed a commercial IP suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, M/s. Shiv C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Borrowers' Challenge Against DRT Orders Rejecting Interim Relief Despite Pending IBC Section 95 Petition. Interim Moratorium Under Section 96 IBC Bars Continuation of Securitisation Proceedings During Pendency of Insolvency Petition.

The petitioners, M/s. Kapole Advertising Agency and others, were the original borrowers who had approached the Bombay High Court challenging two order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Jurisdictional Limits on State Interference in Land Rights: State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012

The case arose from a dispute involving land/tenancy rights and administrative interference by State authorities in West Bengal. The High Court had se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Directors Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Allegations of Active Role in Business Conduct.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Mr. H.S. Bedi (Managing Director) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Directors of Company Not Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Specific Allegations of Role in Day-to-Day Affairs.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Mr. H.S. Bedi and Mrs. Av...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'SUPER MOR CHHAP' Held Deceptively Similar to 'MOR CHHAP'. Registration and Prior Use of 'MOR CHHAP' for Lime Plaster Entitled Plaintiff to Protection Under Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, Sunil Manikchand Kasliwal, filed a suit for trade mark infringement against the defendant, Rahul Uttam Suryavanshi, alleging that the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator to Take Possession of Factory Premises Despite Pending BIFR Reference Under SICA, 1985. Section 22 of SICA, 1985 does not bar winding up proceedings under Companies Act, 1956.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions to direct the ex-director of M/s Lifeline Industries Ltd. (in liquidation) to deposit advert...