Search Results for "Unauthorised construction"

534 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Son's Challenge Against Impleadment of Parents in Property Suit — Order Directing Addition of Parents as Parties Set Aside. Court holds that parents have no independent right to be impleaded in son's suit for possession against third parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Parag Prakash Mutha, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 January 2022 passed by the 7th Additional Judge, Small Causes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Occupancy Certificate and Refund of Security Deposit in CIDCO Development Dispute. Court holds that the developer failed to comply with development control regulations and that the petition was not maintainable due to disputed facts and alternative remedies.

The petitioners, La'BuilDe Associates and its managing partner Bhagvanji Raiyani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Landlord in Suit Against Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888. Landlord's Direct Interest in Property Makes Them a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of a gala in Dhiraj Pen Compound, Andheri, filed a suit challenging a demolition notice dated 17 September 2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Unauthorized Temple Construction in Crowded Area Without Municipal Permission. Court Directs Demolition of Unauthorized Construction and Recovery of Costs from Respondents for Violation of Municipal Laws and Stop Work Notice.

The petitioner, Arun Nathuram Gaikwad, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a temple by respondent Nos.3 to ...