Search Results for "Section 281"

374 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 374 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitrator Appointment in Tender Dispute Due to Absence of Concluded Contract. No Valid Arbitration Agreement Found as Letter of Intent Was Contingent on Formal Work Order Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), a state government electricity distribution utility, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Amidst Disputed Insurance Claims. Navigating jurisdictional challenges and contractual non-disclosure in arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

A Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award for its alleged failur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Not Applicable When Suit Not Barred by Law. The pendency of a probate proceeding does not bar a suit for partition and the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The appellant, Sri Venkatalingaiah Murthy, filed a petition for Letters of Administration (P&SC No.63/2011) in respect of the Will of late Sri K. Moha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Tenants' Revision Petitions in Eviction Cases — Landlord's Bona Fide Requirement for Demolition and Reconstruction Established. Eviction orders under Section 21(1)(h) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 upheld as tenants failed to prove hardship outweighs landlord's need.

The case involves three revision petitions filed by tenants (Vinod G., Dr. Narayuan Waddinnavar, and Meena Pawar) against a common order dated 04.02.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...