High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "Section 164 statement"
1384 result(s) found
Found 1384 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Accused's Right to Default Bail in Pre-Charge Sheet Detention; Holds 60-Day Limit Applies Unless Offence Carries Minimum 10 Years' Imprisonment. Interpretation of 'imprisonment for a term not less than ten years' in Section 167(2) CrPC resolved in favor of personal liberty, entitling accused to statutory bail when charge sheet not filed within 60 days.
1 Jan 1970The case arose from a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution challenging orders of the Gauhati High Court rejecting bail to the petitioner. Th...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.
17 Dec 2014On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple to Ramachandrapura Mutt. The Court Examines Validity of Revenue Department's Order Under Bombay Public Trust Act and Constitutional Provisions.
10 Aug 2018The matter involved a batch of writ petitions and writ appeals filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, including Writ Petition No.30609...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
1 Jan 2026The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...
- 719
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash Charges in Murder Case — Prima Facie Case Made Out Against Accused for Offences Under Sections 143, 147, 148, 302, 120(B), 201 R/w 149 IPC. The court held that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be used to quash proceedings where there is sufficient material to support the charges.
24 Jul 2019The petitioners, accused Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 in Sessions Case No. 70/2018 pending before the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad, filed ...
- 86
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in PC Act Case, Holds Detention Period of 60 Days Applies When Maximum Sentence is Not Explicitly at Least Ten Years. The Court Interprets 'Imprisonment for a Term Not Less Than Ten Years' in Section 167(2) CrPC to Grant Default Bail When Charge Sheet Not Filed Within 60 Days.
1 Aug 2026These Special Leave Petitions were preferred against the order of the Gauhati High Court dated 11.01.2017 rejecting the bail application of the petiti...
- 79
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Army Offence Jurisdiction Dispute, Restoring Sessions Court Trial. Concurrent Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Army Act, 1950 Upheld, with Commanding Officer's Discretion Exercised Through Cooperation with Civil Investigation.
1 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Sikkim, which upheld an order of the Sessions Judge directing that the accused, an Army personne...
- 228
High Court
High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.
11 Jul 2014The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...
- 42
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.
28 Feb 2006Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...
