Search Results for "Revenue Entry"

2432 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2432 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes One-Time Spectrum Charge on Cellular Operators for Spectrum Beyond 6.2 MHz, Holding No Statutory Power Under Telegraph Act, 1885 to Impose Retrospective Charges

The case involved a writ petition filed by major cellular mobile service operators, Bharti Airtel Limited and Vodafone Idea Limited, challenging the i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Revenue Code Case — Suit Barred by Limitation. One-year limitation period under Article 14(4) of Goa, Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code, 1968 computed as British calendar year, suit filed on 24.10.2003 against order dated 24.10.2002 held time-barred.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 30.08.2007 passed by the Adhoc District Judge, FTC-I, South Goa, Margao, in Civil Suit No. 160 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Revision Application Under Indian Forest Act. Minister's order set aside for non-application of mind and failure to consider material evidence regarding agricultural character of land.

The petitioner, Vijayalaxmi Shrinivas Panditrao, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 20th August, 2019 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Holds Revenue Minister's Order Unsustainable for Lack of Reasons in Mutation Entry Dispute. Non-Speaking Order Violates Natural Justice as Court Finds No Consideration of Rival Contentions or Delay.

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenged an order dated 27/08/2014 passed by the Minister (Revenue), Maharashtra St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 25% of Sale Price. Condition Precedent Under Rule 9(3) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Not Fulfilled, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Available.

The petitioner, an individual aged about 70 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court c...