Search Results for "RSA Section 100"

235 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Adverse Possession Case, Upholds Plaintiffs' Right to Possession. State Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Against Private Citizens; Implied Admission of Title by Pleading Adverse Possession Under Order VIII Rule 5 CPC.

The dispute pertains to a piece of land measuring 18 Biswas Pukhta comprised in Khasra No. 2348 and Khasra No. 2458, situated in Bahadurgarh, Haryana,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Declaration and Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title Over Suit Schedule Property Through Maternal Grandfather.

The appellant, Gangappa, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Inam Land Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Succeeds as Plaintiffs Prove Their Father Was Granted Inam Land and They Are in Possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. Co-owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Against Another Co-owner Without Ouster Under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Suresh Chatra, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Based on Adverse Possession Fails as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Hostile Possession for Statutory Period.

The case pertains to a second appeal filed by the first defendant in O.S.No.17/1992 before the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Chintamani, challenging the concur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. The trial court d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Ex-parte Decree Set Aside Application Rejected Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Order IX Rule 13 CPC Application Dismissed as Appellant Failed to Prove 'Sufficient Cause' for Non-Appearance.

The appellant-defendant, Sri M. Nagesh Suvarna, as Managing Trustee of Sri Koradabbu Daivasthana, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 read...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Recovery Suit — Concurrent Findings on Unauthorised Use of Premises Upheld. Damages Awarded for Use and Occupation of Suit Schedule Property Based on Oral and Documentary Evidence.

The respondent/plaintiff instituted Original Suit No.232/1998 on 23.09.1998 before the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge at Belgaum seeking a decree for reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Confirms Half Share to Plaintiff. Sale Deed Executed by Father Without Legal Necessity Held Not Binding on Daughter as Coparcener Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree in R.A. No. 207/1997, which confirmed the trial...