Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

919 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 919 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Reliance on Stale Instances. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Acquittals in Previous Cases, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

The petitioner, Amol alias Guddu s/o Sevakar Khorgade, challenged a detention order dated 08/11/2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Karnataka Act for Twelve Months in First Instance. Detention Order Held Illegal as Contravening Proviso to Section 3(2) and Supreme Court Precedent in Cherukuri Mani; Detenu Ordered Released.

The petitioner, Yallappa, a poor coolie living with his wife and children in Raichur, was detained under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Grounds Were Not Communicated in Tulu, a Language Known to Detenu.

The petitioner, Yashoda, wife of Keshava Poojary @ Choni, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Conditions and In-Camera Statements Did Not Show Prejudicial Activity After Release.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Chandrakant Prabhakar Todankar, challenged the detention order dated 19th August 2004 passed under the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind Due to Mechanical Translation of Documents. Detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority failed to consider translated documents before passing order.

The petitioner, Taufiq Ismail Shaikh @ Pailwan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 20.03.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur...