Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

180 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 180 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Revenue Records — Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Alternative Remedy Under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur disposed of five writ petitions filed by Rajendra Shivsing Chanda, Kamlabai Subhash Gaikwad, Sukhdev Bandu Sonune, Gok...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Quash Order Refusing Withdrawal of Prosecution in RCC No. 18/2003. Court holds that the trial court's order refusing permission to withdraw prosecution under Section 321 CrPC was just and proper, and the application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

The present application was filed by Nitin Ramesh Khairnar seeking to quash and set aside the order dated 20.7.2006 passed by the learned Judicial Mag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Submission of Toilet Certificate. Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j5) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Upheld as Certificate Obtained After Extended Deadline.

The petitioners, five members of Gram Panchayat Dhanodi, challenged their disqualification under Section 14(1)(j5) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch and Upsarpanch in No-Confidence Motion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 17. Failure to Move Motion as Mandated Renders Subsequent Notice Invalid Under Section 35(3A) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioners, Ravindra Sukhdeo Sanap (Sarpanch) and Vishnu Eknath Nagare (Upsarpanch) of Gram Panchayat Andhera, challenged a notice dated 07.12.20...